Calendar Series Article 8 - Poornimanta and Amanta, a confusion?

The ancients were using both, a poornimanta system (a lunar month ending on a full moon day) as well as an amanta system (a lunar month ending on a new moon day).

Were they confused about it or was there something else?
Why does there still exist a controversy on this?

Once we are clear about the basics that Chaitra etc. months are the luni-sidereal solar months, there cannot be a room for co-existence of the two types of systems. If Sun and Moon are referred from the zero at the time when the Chaitra etc. months are supposed to begin the cycle, it has to be an amanta system since Shukla Pratipata (the first day of the bright half) would be the first lunar day and if the reference is when Sun is at zero and Moon is at 180 degree, it is a Poornimanta system as Krishna Pratipata (the first day of the dark half) would be the first lunar day.

In all the ancient texts the reference is specified as Sun and Moon being at zero and that makes it an amanta system by default.

So, in that case what we do have to do with a poornimanta system?

Why do the Vaidic texts, though mention both the systems, have more affinity towards a poornimanta system?

The answer to this lies within the Vedas itself. Once we have learnt correctly how the seasons were identified from the Chaitra etc. months, we also learn that how they maintained superbly the co-existence of both the tropical as well as the sidereal. Thus, it is the seasonal lunar months that can either be poornimanta or amanta depending on how much the precession is from a particular reference of Chaitra etc. months.

My other articles "Article 6 - The poornima fluctuating zone" and "Time to think beyond the metonic cycle" shall also be read in conjunction with this article as they are linked.

The seasonal lunar months are not Chaitra etc. months. They are Madhu etc. months and exist independently. My book "Resolving the Indian Calendar Anomalies" has all the details regarding this. No Indian calendar is perfect that does not address this basic difference.

Share this article:

October 16, 2018

Devinder Dhingra




More to read

Yuga Theory

In almost all the puranas and other ancient Indian texts we find the duration of yuga specified as 4320000 years or 12000 divine years. A divine year in these ..Read the full article..

Banking: Relationship building or a bad sales pitch

It has become a trend these days for bank employees to sell their bank products. The moment you step in a branch, you find sooner or later that the bank representative ..Read the full article..

Resolving IC

Nothing is stable

We’re currently living in a highly competitive world and getting the desired settlement for the child is bound to go difficult day by day. Salaried class thinks business is better as it can be passed ..Read the full article..

Time to think beyond the metonic cycle – the Vedic way

The 19 years metonic cycle is all about aligning the 19 tropical years to 235 synodic months as the period of both was found to be quite close ..Read the full article..

The 2033 Calendar error: what do we learn?

Since nowadays solar terms are used in a Chinese lunar calendar to ascertain the thirteenth intercalary month, i.e. the adhik masa, in 2033 they ..Read the full article..

 
 

 


 

Subscribe Now

 author@ddplanet.in

Site Map

Services

Know your Stars
Music Production

Tips Hub

Pick a Category
Search a Tip

Blogs

Astrology
Criss Cross
Multifarious

Information

Privacy Policy
About
 
 

Copyright© Devinder Dhingra 2015-2024


  ×
ad